raulvt[m]: > <@raulvt:matrix.org> i'm checking a data\_ready bit through i2c, the sensor have 200, 100, 10...Hz modes,
> 
> ```rust
>     pub fn check_data_ready(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error<E>> {
>         let mut retries = 2;
>         while retries > 0 {
>             let status = self.read_register(Register::ST1)?;
>             if (status & 0x01) != 0 {
>                 return Ok(()); // Data ready
>             }
>             std::thread::sleep(self.mode.into());
>             retries -= 1;
>         }
>         Err(Error::DataNotReady)
>     }
> ```
> 
> is better than:
> 
> ```rust
>     pub fn check_data_ready(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error<E>> {
>         let mut retries = 100;
>         while retries > 0 {
>             let status = self.read_register(Register::ST1)?;
>             if (status & 0x01) != 0 {
>                 return Ok(()); // Data ready
>             }
>             retries -= 1;
>         }
>         Err(Error::DataNotReady)
>     }
> ```

If you're in a non rtos then std thread sleep will almost certainly not have the resolution you want here. If you're okay waiting way longer than necessary it's fine though